Dogs as Therapists: The Case of Mickey Rourke

January 16, 2009 in Blogs, Psychology Today by Psychology Today

    On January 11, 2009 Mickey Rourke won the Golden Globe Award for best actor for his performance in Darren Aronofsky’s "The Wrestler." When actors give acceptance speeches for such awards it is quite common for them to thank God and their family for the win, but Mickey Rourke thanked his dogs. If it had not been for the therapeutic effects of his relationship with his dogs, Mickey Rourke might not have been alive to accept this award.    In the film, "The Wrestler," Rourke plays the part of Randy "The Ram" Robinson, a professional wrestler who is now well past his prime, holding on to the remains of a once-famous career, and presented with the opportunity for a comeback. These are circumstances that run more than little parallel to the actor’s own life story.     Rourke seemed destined to be a superstar in the 1980′s. Most critics agreed that his performances in "Diner" (1982), "Rumble Fish" (1983) "9 ½ Weeks" (1986), and "Angel Heart" (1987) seemed to contain signs that the world was witnessing the appearance of another James Dean or even Robert De Niro.    Unfortunately Rourke’s acting career eventually became overshadowed by his personal life and some seemingly eccentric career decisions. Directors such as Alan Parker found it difficult to work with him. Parker stated that "working with Mickey is a nightmare. He is very dangerous on the set because you never know what he is going to do". In addition Rourke began to show the effects of substance abuse. He associated with motorcycle gang members and was involved in several aggressive instances including a charge of spousal abuse (later dropped). Ultimately he virtually disappeared from the cinematic world.     Rourke’s career was revived when director Robert Rodriguez cast him in the role of a sinister hit man in "Once Upon a Time in Mexico" (2003). Two years later Rodriguez again called upon him, this time to play Marv, one of the antiheroes from writer-artist Frank Miller’s crime noir comic book series "Sin City" (2005). In that film Rourke delivered a unforgettable performance, alternately chilling and amusing, that reminded any doubters that he was still a force to be reckoned with. However to get to this stage in his life Rourke required the intervention of a dog.    The possibility that dogs can produce major psychological and health benefits for their human companions has been a subject of much recent serious psychological research. Scientific evidence about the health benefits of a relationship with a dog was first published about 30 years ago by a psychologist, Alan Beck of Purdue University and a psychiatrist, Aaron Katcher of the University of Pennsylvania. These researchers measured what happens physically when a person pets a friendly and familiar dog. They found that the person’s blood pressure lowered, his heart rate slowed, breathing became more regular and muscle tension relaxed-all of which are signs of reduced stress.    A recent study published in the Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine not only confirmed these effects, but showed changes in blood chemistry demonstrating a lower amount of stress-related hormones such as cortisol. These effects seem to be automatic, they do not require any conscious efforts or training on the part of the stressed individual. Perhaps most amazingly, these positive psychological effects are achieved faster-after only five to 24 minutes of interacting with a dog-than the result from taking most stress-relieving drugs. Compare this to some of the Prozac or Xanax-type drugs used to deal with stress and depression. Such drugs alter the levels of the neurotransmitter serotonin in the body and can take weeks to show any positive effects. Furthermore, the benefits that build up over this long course of medication can be lost with only few missed doses of the drug. Petting a dog has a virtually immediate effect and can be done at any time. Recently, researchers extended this research by looking at a group of people aged 60 and older, living alone, except for a pet. Non-pet owners were four times more likely to be diagnosed as clinically depressed than pet owners of the same age. The evidence also showed that pet owners required fewer medical services and were more satisfied with their lives.    Depression was, indeed, Mickey Rourke’s problem in the 1990′s. In his case when all friends left him he was left with only his dog, for solace. Rourke admits that things had gotten bad enough so that went into a closet with his beloved dog Beau Jack, locking the door and planning to commit suicide with a drug overdose. In the end he just couldn’t go through with it because of his relationship to his little Chihuahua-cross dog. Rourke describes the scene saying, "(I was) doing some crazy s**t, but I saw a look in Beau Jack’s eyes, and I put the s**t down. That dog saved my life."    Rourke’s life took a major turn after these events. He became active in animal welfare issues, including an involvement with PETA and its spay and neutering campaign. He increased the number of dogs in his house, first by adding Beau Jack’s daughter, Loki. The depth of his bond to his dogs became obvious when Beau Jack died in 2002. He recalls, "I gave him mouth-to-mouth for 45 minutes before they peeled me off. Depressed? He died at my home, and I didn’t go back for two weeks."    Rourke’s canine family has continued to grow. He says "I have five now – Loki, Jaws, Ruby Baby, La Negra and Bella Loca–but Loki is my number one." In describing his relationship to Loki he added, "My dog [Loki] is very old, she is 16 and she is not going to be around for long so I want to spend every moment with her. When I was filming "Stormbreaker" in England, I had to have her flown over because I missed her so much. I had to get her from New York to Paris and Paris to England, and also pay for someone to come with her. The whole thing cost about $5,400."    Rourke seems to understand the therapeutic value of dogs. He says of Loki, "She’s like a giant Xanax, you know? I’m not going to get religious on your ass, but I truly believe God created dogs for a cause. They are the greatest companions a man could ever have."    So it was that following his remarkable comeback to a successful acting career, and following his rise from the depth of depression, that Mickey Rourke was able to stand in front of colleagues to accept his Golden Globe award. However his speech was different from the others. It not only included references to the contributions and the support of colleagues and professional associates, but also contained the lines, "I’d like to thank all my dogs, the ones that are here, the ones that aren’t here anymore, because sometimes when a man’s alone that’s all you got is your dog, and they meant the world to me."     © 2009 Psychology Today. This RSS Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact blogs@psychologytoday.com so we can take legal action immediately.

View original here:
Dogs as Therapists: The Case of Mickey Rourke

Fifth Week: Overcome Your Worry by Overcoming Your Fear of Failure

January 16, 2009 in Blogs, Psychology Today by Psychology Today

I don’t know about you, but no one ever taught me how to fail successfully. There was no course in college called, "Failure 101". I’m not sure if they would grade you as Pass/Fail in such a course, but that course wasn’t offered. But as we all know, failure is an inevitable part of our lives-and no one has gone out of his or her way to get us prepared. We’ve heard unhelpful ideas such as, "Winning is everything" and "How to win and never lose" and "There are winners and losers". It’s a lot of hype. Everyone loses sometime. Even the people we admire most have had big losses. Whether it’s sports, finance, relationships, academics, medicine, law, construction, or business—we all have to face some losses. We are not "winners" or "losers". But we do have some experiences, some moments, when we lose and some when we win. You worry in order to avoid failure Your worry may be driven by your perfectionistic idea that you should never fail or that failure is horrible or that failure is humiliating. You worry to "be sure" you don’t fail. You think that if you worry you will avoid any failure. But what is so bad about a failure—now and then? I’ll give you an example of someone I know. Let’s call him Larry. Now, Larry got his PhD in psychology and took the licensing exam. Much to his surprise he didn’t pass the exam. Larry thought he was stupid, a failure, and that everyone who knew him would think he was loser. But, much to his credit, he actually decided to study really hard before he took it the next time. He passed. Years later, he is very successful, with a large practice. Larry was able to bounce back from an experience of failure, try harder, learn more and finally have a successful experience. Larry overcame an obstacle. Larry was a student of mine years ago and his experience encourages me every time I think about how we need to face failure. His experience with failing at the exam taught me something. The question for you, when you think about the possibility of failing, is, "What about failure is so bad?" What’s so bad about failing? If you think that FAILURE IS A CATASTROPHE then you will be reluctant to try new things, you will avoid any risks, and you will worry about failing in the future. Do any of the following sound like you? • I can’t stand failing • If I fail at something, I think that "I AM A FAILURE" • People will think I’m a loser if I fail. • I shouldn’t try something unless I am sure I won’t fail • If I fail, I might as well give up   Twenty ways to overcome your fear of failing We could go on, but you get the point. You just "can’t stand" failing. But that intolerance of difficulty–your inability to fall down and get back up— keeps you stuck in your worrisome mind. But what if you no longer feared failure? What if you accepted the idea that sometimes you will fall down-only to get back up? What if you thought you could learn from failing, try harder, be proud of overcoming an obstacle? What then? Your fear of failure has kept you trapped. The good news is that you can change it. I’ve developed twenty coping ideas that you might use to help you confront your fear of failure. In fact, you can think about confronting failure as an opportunity to let go with your worry. Let’s see if any of the following twenty coping statements could help you. 1. I didn’t fail, my behavior failed 2. I can learn from my failure 3. I can be challenged by my failure 4. I can try harder 5. Maybe it wasn’t a failure 6. I can focus on other behaviors that will succeed 7. I can focus on what I can control 8. It wasn’t essential to succeed at that 9. There were some behaviors that did pay off 10. Everyone fails at something 11. Maybe no one noticed 12. Did I have the right goal? 13. Failure is not fatal 14. Were my standards too high? 15. Did I do better than before? 16. I can still do everything I always did, even though this failed 17. Failing at something means I tried. Not trying is worse. 18. I’ve just begun 19. Tomorrow is another success 20. Tomorrow is today Think about something you are worried about. Perhaps you are worried that you won’t do well on a test, or that someone might not like you, or that you might lose some money, or…whatever. Then go through the coping ideas listed above and think about how you could use these. Let us know. Let us know about what you think is so bad about failing. Let us know how you have learned to cope with that fear. And , let’s learn from failing. This is FAILURE 101. I discuss these coping ideas in my book, The Worry Cure: Seven Steps to Stop Worry from Stopping You . More later. © 2009 Psychology Today. This RSS Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact blogs@psychologytoday.com so we can take legal action immediately.

Continued here:
Fifth Week: Overcome Your Worry by Overcoming Your Fear of Failure

Study Finds Egg In The Face Can Be Dangerous [Culture Dish]

January 14, 2009 in Blogs, Brain & Behaviour by BrainAndBehaviour

Here’s some good solid (and useful) science for you: Researchers in Liverpool have announced that “being pelted by a raw egg may result in eye injury.” How they know: They studied the medical records of 18,651 patients who’d gone to an eye unit over the course of 14 months. Thirteen turned out to be egg attack victims. As the BBC reported : “The researchers warn that egg hurling, sometimes used as a form of protest or prank, is far from harmless. They point out, in the Emergency Medical Journal, that an egg has the same dimensions as a squash ball but carries even more weight when lobbed. Jon Durnian, lead author of the paper from the Royal Liverpool University Hospital, said: “The shape and weight of an egg makes it a perfect instrument to cause quite a lot of damage it it is thrown accurately … Mr Durnian said the public should be made aware of the damage an egg can cause and that throwing eggs should definitely not be encouraged.” Durnian has a special beef with companies who sell eggs specifically designed for lobbing, like “Mischief Eggs,” which are apparently sold during Halloween. Who knew? Now, you’re probably thinking to yourself, Who throws eggs anymore? I haven’t heard of anyone throwing eggs in years! Well, I must say, if I’d known about those Mischief Eggs, I may have gotten some. Because the truth is, in the last few years, I’ve actually thrown a few eggs: For years apartment was directly above the entrance to the Lincoln Tunnel in Manhattan, which meant the streets below my windows turned into a huge parking lot during rush hour. Several times a week, people stuck in that traffic leaned on their horns endlessly, as if their blaring would help move cars stopped all the way to New Jersey. This does not bring out the best in people: Some people would roll down windows and shout obscenities at the honkers, others got out of their cars, puffed up their chests and actually pounded on the windows of honkers.  And I — twice in three years — opened my window and hurled eggs at honkers. Fortunately for them, they’re in cars with their eyes not pointed toward the eggs. And my aim is terrible, so I couldn’t hit a person if I tried. But I can apparently hit the hood of a car. Update:  I may have lobbed a few eggs at certain political yard signs and banners during the lead up to the last election (and the one before that). Read the comments on this post…

See the original post: 
Study Finds Egg In The Face Can Be Dangerous [Culture Dish]

Clock News [A Blog Around The Clock]

January 13, 2009 in Blogs, Brain & Behaviour by BrainAndBehaviour

Chemotherapy Most Effective At Time Of Day When Particular Enzyme At Lowest Level : For years, research has hinted that the time of day that cancer patients receive chemotherapy can impact their chances of survival. But the lack of a clear scientific explanation for this finding has kept clinicians from considering timing as a factor in treatment. Now, a new study from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill has suggested that treatment is most effective at certain times of day because that is when a particular enzyme system – one that can reverse the actions of chemotherapeutic drugs – is at its lowest levels in the body. When It Comes To Sleep Research, Fruit Flies And People Make Unlikely Bedfellows : You may never hear fruit flies snore, but rest assured that when you’re asleep they are too. According to research published in the January 2009 issue of the journal Genetics scientists from the University of Missouri-Kansas City have shown that the circadian rhythms (sleep/wake cycles) of fruit flies and vertebrates are regulated by some of the same “cellular machinery” as that of humans. This study is significant because the sleep-regulating enzyme analyzed in this research is one of only a few possible drug targets for circadian problems that can lead to seasonal affective disorder (SAD), insomnia, and possibly some cancers. Getting Less Sleep Associated With Lower Resistance To Colds : Individuals who get less than seven hours of sleep per night appear about three times as likely to develop respiratory illness following exposure to a cold virus as those who sleep eight hours or more, according to a report in the January 12 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals. Read the comments on this post…

Here is the original post:
Clock News [A Blog Around The Clock]

The Explosive Side of Judging Personality

January 5, 2009 in Blogs, Psychology Today by Psychology Today

Judging someone’s personality can be explosive.  A positive judgment can propel a person forward in life, like fuel can propel a rocket.  A negative judgment can explode a person’s plans, leaving behind only shattered hopes and dreams.  Examples of judgments that can propel a person forward include when: voters judge a candidate as capable of leading, and elect her to office. a career counselor perceives an employee to be bright and conscientious and helps him to find high-level employment. an awards committee judges a candidate’s character and achievements  as worthy of a a prize, bestows that prize, and in that way helps her to attain her goals over time. community members discover that one of their own is from a well-respected family, which raises his status among those who know him. Although positive judgments abound, negative judgments like these can take their toll: voters judge a candidate’s personality as lacking in moral fiber; the description "sticks" and the candidate’s political future is over. a jury determines that the defendant’s nature is to deceive others, lie, and cheat; the jury convicts the man and the judge sends him to jail. a psychiatrist assesses a person’s mental status and concludes that she is out of touch with reality, psychologically incompetent, and therefore must be institutionalized. At other times, an individual may react so powerfully to a negative judgment as to destroy him or herself: a murderer may kill his victim because (he perceived) the victim had demeaned his personality – insulted him. The murderer’s only remaining future is in jail. a man in a jealous state seeks evidence of his wife’s infidelity, concludes, "My wife is a slut," and kills her. He, too, spends the rest of his life in jail. another husband learns that other people believe his wife slept with another man. Some judge the husband as "less of a man" to put up with her. The only way to reclaim his reputation, he may decide, is to harm his wife, still further jeopardizng his own future — and hers. Organizations render judgments that steer some people off-course while pushing others further toward their goals: when a manager judges someone as lazy and careless, that person’s career may be sidetracked or ended.  When a teacher judges a student as gifted, the student’s future in the school and in getting a job may be assured.  Self-judgments affect us too: judge yourself as unable to succeed and you may be less likely to even try. judge yourself as able to carry out a task and you will be more likely to do well. There are numerous lesser judgments which we engage in every day: judging who is on time, who to trust with one’s house key, who left the lights on. We judge who can be trusted with our investments , or who can borrow our car. We make judgments we hope never to test: which relatives might care for us (or our children) in case disaster strikes and we are unable to do so ourselves. Judgments of character can provoke an explosion among groups who hold a stake in the assessment and are dismayed by the process.  Court-room trials can trigger riots if people believe someone was wrongly convicted. Accusations of slander are leveled against people who criticize those we admire.  A potentially-stigmatizing psychiatric diagnosis may be criticized, and outraged commentary may be posted on the web if it appears biased in some ways. When a member of a rich and powerful family is treated as "better than others" members of the public are sure to point it out. Judgments, like explosives, can detonate in a controllled fashion, or unpredictably. My hypothesis is that both those who judge personality and those who criticize such judgments often lose sight of the explosive territory they enter. Even professional psychologists are limited in understanding why, for example, when they interpret a client’s behavior (a form of judgment) the client so often resists. By understanding personality judgment in the broad sweep of our cultural history, it will be possible to better come to grips with judgments of ourselves and others, and to better inform ourselves as to when and how it makes sense to judge.  Making judgments is never easy. It has never been easy. It has never been done perfectly. Yet it always has been done because it must be done. This post and those to follow continue what I began in November 2008 , illuminating the natural history of judging personality that takes place around us, and has (I have argued) taken place throughout history. In the coming weeks, I will continue with my examination of judging personality, including the earliest evidence of such practices.   *** Welcome back to readers of the "Judging Personality" series of posts… Click here for more information about the Personality Analyst posts, including schedules, coverage, key terminology, etc.. Click here for previous posts in the series. Notes: Berg, I. A. & Fox, V. (1947). Factors in homicides committed by 200 males. Journal of Social Psychology , 26, 109-119. 200 males convicted of 1st or 2nd degree murder, murdered their wives for reasons of infidelity or arguments over money; males murdered other males for perceived insults. "A man whose wife is unfaithful…will be judged" Vandello, J. A., & Cohen, D. (2003). Male honor and female fidelity: Implicit cultural scripts that perpetuate domestic violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 997-1010. © Copyright 2009, John D. Mayer © 2009 Psychology Today. This RSS Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact blogs@psychologytoday.com so we can take legal action immediately.

Read the original post: 
The Explosive Side of Judging Personality

"Predatory Intelligence," online now [Laelaps]

December 21, 2008 in Blogs, Brain & Behaviour by BrainAndBehaviour

I’ve been waiting for this day all month. My article “Predatory Intelligence,” which considers the beauty and ugliness of spotted hyenas, is now available for free in the journal Antennae . For some reason it is not listed in the table of contents, but it is in there, sure enough. Just scroll down to page #23. I hope you enjoy it! Read the comments on this post…

Read the original here: 
"Predatory Intelligence," online now [Laelaps]

Long article on the relationship between morality and evolutionary biology [Dr. Joan Bushwell's Chimpanzee Refuge]

December 20, 2008 in Blogs, Brain & Behaviour by BrainAndBehaviour

Those with a yen for philosophical musings are no doubt aware of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , a repository of freely accessible articles. I don’t read much on the subject compared to many here, but I did catch this piece , an attempt to reconcile the ever-expanding reach of evolutionary biology with moral precepts that have long been almost solely the bailiwick of philosophers. It begins with a series of paragraphs which, though boilerplate in character, introduce a number of compelling questions: Read the rest of this post… | Read the comments on this post…

The rest is here:
Long article on the relationship between morality and evolutionary biology [Dr. Joan Bushwell's Chimpanzee Refuge]

Friday Weird Science: Which porn gets you hot, baby? [Neurotopia (version 2.0)]

December 12, 2008 in Blogs, Brain & Behaviour by BrainAndBehaviour

UGH. First off my apologies for the weird scheduling. I have no idea why it posted itself four days ago. And I have to start this with a personal porn anecdote. You KNOW you wanna hear it. Woodard et al. “What kind of erotic film clips should we use in female sex research? An exploratory study.” Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2008. Read the rest of this post… | Read the comments on this post…

Read more from the original source:
Friday Weird Science: Which porn gets you hot, baby? [Neurotopia (version 2.0)]

Tactile-emotion synaesthesia [Neurophilosophy]

December 1, 2008 in Blogs, Brain & Behaviour by BrainAndBehaviour

S ynaesthesia is a neurological condition in which stimuli of one sensory modality evoke experiences in another modality. This is thought to occur as a result of  insufficient “pruning” during development, so that most of the pathways connecting parts of the brain mediating the different senses remain in place instead of being eliminated. Consequently, there is too much cross-talk between sensory systems, such that activation of one sensory pathway leads simultaneously to activity in another. Once believed to be extremely rare, synaesthesia is now thought to be relatively common. The cross-modal connections implicated in the condition are present in all of us, to a greater or lesser extent. Thus, some researchers argue that we all experience synaesthesia-like sensations to some degree, but that these sensations are particularly intense in only some individuals. Earlier this year, researchers from the California Institute of Technology described a new form of the condition, called hearing-touch synaesthesia , in which moving visual stimuli evoke sounds. Now Vilayanur Ramachandran and David Brang of the Center for Brain and Cognition at the University of California, San Diego report another unusual form of the condition. In the journal Neurocase , they describe the first two known cases of individuals  with what they have called tactile-emotion synaesthesia, who experience a specific emotion whenever they touch a particular texture.  Read the rest of this post… | Read the comments on this post…

Originally posted here:
Tactile-emotion synaesthesia [Neurophilosophy]

Blind people are better at finding their way [Neurophilosophy]

November 25, 2008 in Blogs, Brain & Behaviour by BrainAndBehaviour

For most of us, visual perception is crucial for spatial navigation. We rely on vision to find our way around, to position ourselves and localize objects within the surroundings, and to plan our trajectory on the basis of the layout of the environment. Blind people would therefore seem to be at a disadvantage. Unable to rely on vision, they depend instead upon different sorts of cues to form their representations of space. They rely, for example, on proprioception, which provides a sense of the location, movement and posture of one’s own body through space, and on vestibular information regarding changes in the rotational movements of the head. To compensate for their inability to understand their environment visually, blind persons also store large amounts of non-visual information regarding the spatial organization of their environment, and are more reliant on this information than are sighted individuals. A team of Canadian researchers therefore predicted that blind people would perform better on spatial navigation tasks than sighted individuals, and that they would also show differences in the size of the hippocampus, the region on the inner surface of the temporal lobe which is involved in spatial memory. Remarkably, the study, which is published in the November issue of the journal Brain , confirmed both of these predictions. Read the rest of this post… | Read the comments on this post…

Here is the original: 
Blind people are better at finding their way [Neurophilosophy]