Mindful Eating

February 5, 2009 in Blogs, Psychology Today by Psychology Today

You’ve been working hard on a project on the computer, and it’s time for at treat. You’ve been holding off, waiting for the delicious taste of – here, please fill in the blank. Coffee ice cream? a piece of dark chocolate? a donut? an onion bagel? some fresh strawberries? .         For me, it would be a creamy, sweet-sour lemon tart. You take the first bite. Very yummy! You take the second bite. Still yummy, maybe a little less yummy than the first bite, but never mind. You glance at the computer and something catches your eye. A Hollywood scandal, a political gaff, a weird and wacky video. You click on it, watch, and continue eating. Disappearing food! Suddenly you look down. Where did that treat go? Your fingers are sticky and there’s still a trace of flavor on your tongue, so it must have disappeared down the hatch while you weren’t looking . . . or smelling, or tasting, or enjoying. Disappointment and dissatisfaction set in. "That one just vanished! I’d better have another one." Next the internal critic voice pipes up "What are you thinking? One treat is enough. You know you’re trying to lose weight/eat better/stop grazing/etc." Thus begins the struggle over the simple, biologically natural, pleasurable act of eating. When I tell people that I’ve written a book on Mindful Eating*, and describe what it is, almost everyone will relate some difficulty they have with food, from an embarrassed confession of an addiction to chocolate to the palpable misery of binging and purging. How is it that food and eating have become such a common source of unhappiness? And why has it occurred in a country with an abundance of food? The fundamental reason for our imbalance with food and eating is that we’ve forgotten how to be present as we eat. We eat mindlessly. Food, fat cells and the stomach are not the problem We decided that the problem was in the food, so we’ve used chemical technology to take the calories out, the fat out, and to substitute chemical sweeteners and artificial fats. Food is food. It is neither good nor bad. Then we decided the problem was our fat cells, so we liposuctioned them out. Fat cells are just trying to do their job, which is to store energy for lean times ahead or for famine. For most of our evolutionary history, starvation was one snowstorm or drought away. Our fat cells are there to help us survive! When I lived in Africa I discovered that skinny women there have trouble finding spouses. They aren’t considered good marriage material —- they’ll get sick and die on you! Then we decided that the digestive system was the problem, so we staple the stomach or surgically by-pass the small intestine. The digestive system is just trying to do its job, breaking down food, absorbing nutrients and excreting what’s not needed. (There’s no question that bariatric surgery can be an emergency life-saving measure for some people. It works by forcing people to eat mindfully, causing pain and vomiting if they don’t. It is very expensive, has lots of side effects, and is not a long-term solution for the majority of people or for children with out-of-balance eating.) The problem is not in the food, the fat cells or the stomach and intestines. The problem lies in the mind. It lies in our lack of awareness of the messages coming in from our body, from our very cells and from our heart. Mindful eating helps us learn to hear what our body is telling us about hunger and satisfaction. It helps us become aware of who in the body/heart/mind complex is hungry, and how and what is best to nourish it. Mindful eating is natural, interesting, fun, and cheap. In this blog I’ll explore many aspects of Mindful Eating and Mindless Eating.** I’ll include interesting research on eating, cross cultural observations, and personal stories from our Mindful Eating workshops. I’ll also include Mindful Eating "Homework" at the end of each blog. These are suggestions for how to weave mindful eating into your life. People who take our mindful eating workshops really enjoy doing the homework. Don’t give yourself a grade. Of course you won’t do it perfectly. Just give it a try. What Is Mindfulness? Let’s start with what Mindfulness is. It is deliberately paying attention, being fully aware of what is happening both inside and outside yourself – in your body, heart and mind – and outside yourself, in your environment. Mindfulness is awareness without criticism or judgement. The last sentence is very important. In mindful eating we are not comparing ourselves to anyone else. We are not judging ourselves or others. We are simply witnessing the many sensations and thoughts that come up as we eat. The recipe for mindful eating calls for the warming effect of kindness and the spice of curiosity. What is Mindful Eating? Mindful eating involves paying full attention to the experience of eating and drinking, both inside and outside the body. We pay attention to the colors, smells, textures, flavors, temperatures, and even the sounds (crunch!) of our food. We pay attention to the experience of the body. Where in the body do we feel hunger? Where do we feel satisfaction? What does half-full feel like, or three quarters full? We also pay attention to the mind. While avoiding judgement or criticism, we watch when the mind gets distracted, pulling away from full attention to what we are eating or drinking. We watch the impulses that arise after we’ve taken a few sips or bites: to grab a book, to turn on the TV, to call someone on our cell phone, or to do web search on some interesting subject. We notice the impulse and return to just eating. We notice how eating affects our mood and how our emotions like anxiety influence our eating. Gradually we regain the sense of ease and freedom with eating that we had in childhood. It is our natural birthright. The old habits of eating and not paying attention are not easy to change. Don’t try to make drastic changes. Lasting change takes time, and is built on many small changes. We start simply. Pick your mindful eating homework (1) Try taking the first four sips of a cup of hot tea or coffee with full attention? (2) If you are reading and eating, try alternating these activities, not doing both at once? Read a page, then put the book down and eat a few bites, savoring the tastes, then read another page, and so on. (3) At family meals, you might ask everyone to eat in silence for the first five minutes, thinking about the many people who brought the food to your plates. (4) Try eating one meal a week mindfully, alone and in silence. Be creative. For example, could you eat lunch behind a closed office door, or even alone in our car? Enjoy your meal! Further Reading and listening: * Mindful Eating : A Guide to Rediscovering a Healthy and Joyful Relationship with Food, by Jan Chozen Bays, with an introduction by Jon Kabat-Zinn, released February 3, 2009 by Shambhala Publishing. (Includes a CD of 14 mindful eating exercises and meditations.) ** Mindless Eating: Why We Eat More Than We Think, by Brian Wansink, published 2006 by Bantam Books. (A very funny look at very interesting research about how we all eat mindlessly.) © 2009 Psychology Today. This RSS Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact blogs@psychologytoday.com so we can take legal action immediately.

Continued here:
Mindful Eating

Avatar of Psychology Today

by Vaughan

The hashish inspired art of Jean-Martin Charcot

February 3, 2009 in Blogs, Mind Hacks by Vaughan

While searching for material on the famous 19th Century French neurologist Jean-Martin Charcot , I noticed that a number of online art shops sell drawings he did, apparently while under the influence of hashish – so I’ve been trying to find out more. The strip above is only part of the image, as despite the fact that it is now in the public domain, most of the online sources deliberately obscure it, presumably in an attempt to get you to buy their posters while pissing off potential customers at the same time. However, it seems that the picture is likely to be genuine. This is from a book on Charcot’s life where a contemporary recounts their hashish smoking escapades: As soon as he was under the influence of the narcotic, a tumult of phantasmogoric visions flashed across his mind. The entire page was covered with drawings: prodigious dragons, grimacing monsters, incoherent personages who were superimposed on each other and who were intertwined and twisted in a fabulous whirlpool bringing to mind the apocalyptic visions of Van Bosh and Jacques Callot. A 2004 article in the medical journal European Neurology discussed his lifelong interest in art and drawing, and contains a sketch of a scene from Hell also apparently created while stoned. If anyone does know of a high quality online source of these drawings online, do let me know, as I’d particularly love to see the larger image in its full glorious detail. Link to European Neurology on ‘Charcot and Art: From a Hobby to Science’. Link to PubMed entry for same.

Continued here: 
The hashish inspired art of Jean-Martin Charcot

High anxiety (Neurological Lyme Disease, Part Three)

February 1, 2009 in Blogs, Psychology Today by Psychology Today

  Read more about neurological Lyme disease here Robert Bransfield is a psychiatrist with a practice in Red Bank, New Jersey, along the sleepy Navesink River, just inland from the glitz and neon of the Jersey shore. Tall and professorial, with a charm and humility so natural it catches you by surprise, Bransfield seems an unlikely rebel, but experience with patients at the heart of the Lyme epidemic has left him little choice. The first Lyme disease patient he brought back from the brink worked as an assistant to a veterinarian, making her risk for exposure especially high. Late in the summer of her twenty-second year, she developed the classic symptoms of Lyme disease and was treated with oral antibiotics. When they didn’t make a dent in her condition, her doctor placed her on intravenous Rocephin and she appeared to get well. But almost two years later, she came down with a new set of symptoms, this time psychiatric. Not only was she irritable and anxious, she also began to check things obsessively and eventually descended into a deep depression. Her psychiatric symptoms were so numerous, in fact, it was impossible to label her as having just a single disorder. She developed mania with rapid mood swings, from grandiosity to sudden tearfulness; paranoid delusions; auditory hallucinations; verbal aggressiveness; and violent impulses. She also suffered cognitive dysfunction, including trouble in spelling, writing, and verbal fluency. Despite hospitalization and treatment with "every psychotropic imaginable," says Bransfield, the patient declined, her depression becoming so severe that she tried to kill herself. "This was very different from run-of-the-mill bipolar disorder," Bransfield said. "She kept getting worse, and she had physical symptoms, too. It forced the question: Could it be a reoccurrence of Lyme disease? She was so depressed I believed suicide was inevitable, so with no other option in sight, I began seeking a physician willing to treat her with antibiotics for Lyme disease. No one was willing to take the responsibility, so I wrote the order for intravenous Rocephin myself. It was a lifesaving decision. The patient responded to the treatment and today remains mentally and physically well." Bransfield described the case in the medical journal Psychosomatics in 1995, and it didn’t take long for other Lyme disease patients to beat a path to his door. As a result of the influx, Bransfield reports he’s found a connection between Lyme disease and aggression in a small but significant group. He had one Lyme disease patient who’d become so paranoid that he assaulted five police officers in an episode of rage, and Bransfield admitted him to the hospital’s psychiatric unit. During the hospital stay the patient made his way to the river behind the facility to watch fireworks on the Fourth of July and was so startled by the sound that he jumped into the river. A fourteen-year-old boy in Bransfield’s study repeatedly attempted to choke his mother to death, destroy his house, knock over furniture, and kick and punch holes through the walls and doors. A woman, age forty, became so enraged when a garbage truck cut her off on the road that she followed it back to the station, honking her horn and screaming all the way. In fact, she "was so crazed," she reported, that she felt like choking the driver to death. Bransfield says that in each and every case, the aggression resolved when these patients were treated for Lyme disease. Hoping to spread the word, he’s even testified in court when he believes defendants have been adversely influenced by Lyme disease to commit a crime. In 2001, he spoke out on behalf of a young man, age twenty-two, who attacked his neighbor with a medieval ax. It was partially treated, late-stage Lyme disease with brain involvement, including seizures that caused loss of memory and episodes of missing time, which led to the violence, Bransfield said. Despite his testimony, the young man was found guilty. Bransfield has had more success testifying for a few women arrested for shoplifting. "These cases involved encephalopathy," Bransfield says. "The women were in such a fog they’d be holding something they hadn’t paid for, without even realizing it, and would walk right out of the store. When the guards stopped them they were so confused they weren’t able to explain what had gone on." Bransfield has also been following another thread-the theory that Lyme disease and autism are somehow linked. The idea derives in part from observation: Women with Lyme disease seem to be having more than their share of autistic offspring, he reports, and when children with autism get Lyme disease, their autism gets worse. Bransfield says that ten of the fifteen top Lyme states-including Connecticut, Rhode Island, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania-are also most endemic for autism. And he and his colleagues say they’ve found compelling evidence in studies of blood. In one study he references, 22 percent of autistic subjects tested positive for Lyme disease. In another, it was 20 to 30 percent. Other infections, especially mycoplasma, he adds, may be involved. As the theory gains traction, families with autistic children have formed organizations and held conferences, testing their children for Lyme disease and seeing if treatment can help. Is Lyme disease causing the autism? "Not exactly," Bransfield believes. Instead, the children are already immunologically vulnerable, and a multitude of triggers, be it Lyme borreliosis or a chemical sensitivity, might set them off. To see if the theory holds, Brian Fallon has launched an epidemiological study comparing the rate of autism in two heavily Lyme-endemic areas in New Jersey and Connecticut to areas where Lyme is rare. Psychiatrists like Bransfield remain light-years apart from those clasically trained in infectious disease and some other medical specialties, who, by and large, do not see subjective cognitive or psychiatric symptoms as signs of Lyme. But the issue is one of perspective. Those first describing Lyme disease in the early literature were trained in rheumatology and dermatology. The ‘objective signs’ they recognized -palpably swollen joints, antibody production, and an erythema migrans rash-derived from the specialty-specific training they had. Later, neurologists added their specialized ‘signs’ to the mix: cranial nerve palsy, gross meningitis, and measurably damaged nerves. By these standards, virtually one hundred percent of those treated for Lyme disease are cured, but that ignores the fact that a huge number of patients still have cognitive problems, fatigue, pain, and mood swings. Because those symptoms weren’t objectified early in the history of the disease, by the specific specialties first involved, they were never added into the calculus for dignosing the diease. But psychiatrists –more of them each day– feel that signs and symptoms of psychiatric disease are highly relevant, even if rheumatologists and l neurologists still lack of appreciation for these other ways of defining illness and objectifying signs and symptoms of disease. You don’t need to be a scientist or doctor to observe the obvious: If one doctor offers no relief, patients will seek help from someone with a different perspective or point of view.  Because patients stay with doctors based on treatment outcome-and because outcome varies so widely depending upon whom you talk to-it is impossible to say that doctors across the specialties are seeing the same kind of patient. Even if the precipitating infections were once identical, is it now the same disease?   Read more about neurological Lyme disease here Adapted from Cure Unknown: Inside the Lyme Epidemic . Pamela Weintraub is senior editor at Discover Magazine   © 2009 Psychology Today. This RSS Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact blogs@psychologytoday.com so we can take legal action immediately.

Read more from the original source: 
High anxiety (Neurological Lyme Disease, Part Three)

Men Who Fake Orgasms

February 1, 2009 in Blogs, Psychology Today by Psychology Today

There may not be anything all that unusual about women faking orgasms. But what about men? It turns out some men vie for Oscars in the bedroom too. Why would a man need to fake an orgasm? To understand, it may be helpful to look at the reasons women give for doing so. One of the best discourses on this topic, from the "Show me" School rather than the dry medical literature, is the scene from the classic movie When Harry Met Sally, in which actors Meg Ryan and Billy Crystal are sitting in a restaurant discussing Crystal’s certainty that no woman has ever faked an orgasm with him. "How do you know?" asks Meg Ryan. "Most women have faked it at one time or another." She then proceeds to mimic an orgasm, complete with moans and shrieks, right at their table. When she is done, a middle-aged woman sitting nearby says to the waiter, "I’ll have what she’s having." Why do women fake orgasms? A female colleague suggests "it’s just a little white lie." Women, she explains, don’t always experience orgasms with sex, but men may be disappointed if she doesn’t have one. Faking an orgasm makes the guy feel he’s done a good job as a lover, and also allows the activity to come to an end, which can be particularly useful with a partner determined to prove his manly mettle. So, what does this have to do with guys? Aren’t men always able to have an orgasm? After all, the single most common sexual dysfunction among men is that they come too quickly, with anywhere from 10-30% of men reporting premature or rapid ejaculation in various studies. Yet not all men are alike, and some men may actually be unable to reach The Promised Land. Ever. Big problem. A more complicated story was provided by Jim (real names not used), a 33 year old software engineer who had been married for a little more than one year. Jim was happy in his marriage to Gloria, and the sex was fine, but there was a catch- he just couldn’t achieve an orgasm during intercourse. He had no trouble having an orgasm with masturbation, mind you. It was only a problem during sex. Neither Jim nor Gloria had been very active sexually prior to their marriage, leaving them with little to compare this to. At first Gloria considered Jim’s inability to climax "A little weird," but soon she began to doubt her own feminine skills and started to ask Jim, "Am I doing it wrong?" and "You don’t find me sexy, do you?" The pressure mounted (!), and soon Jim hit upon a solution- he started faking his own orgasm. This seemed to work, as Gloria seemed pleased with their sex life. Yet Jim still didn’t understand what was happening to him. There can be a number of reasons why men may have a difficult time achieving an orgasm during intercourse. Medications, particularly the SSRI antidepressants, are the most common cause. Neurologic conditions and diabetes can contribute, by decreasing genital sensation. And sometimes it’s psychological. I had a patient once who was ambivalent about having children. Although he had nodded assent when his wife asked "So, you agree it’s ok if I stop taking my birth control pills?" he really didn’t feel prepared to take the giant leap of fatherhood. No wonder he withheld his magic seed. In Jim’s case, it turned out that his technique of achieving orgasm during masturbation was to lie prone and rub his body against the bed, something he’d learned as a twelve-year old. As pointed out by my colleague, Dr. Michael Perelman, some masturbatory practices, such as Jim’s, bear little resemblance to the stimulation achieved during actual intercourse. This seemed to be Jim’s problem. The goal of therapy in these men is a hands-on approach ( of course!) in which the men re-train the penis so that they can learn to have an orgasm with stimulation that is more like sex. Eventually, men like Jim should be able to have an orgasm from sex itself. I’ve referred Jim to an experienced sex therapist, and I hear he’s making good progress. In the meantime, he enjoys sex with his wife, but continues to fake orgasms. Is it OK for Jim to do this?  Is it really any different than a woman faking an orgasm, other than the missing "evidence" (more on that upcoming in Part 2)?   Whether it’s right or wrong is hard for me to say, but I do find Jim’s motivations instructive. Jim fakes orgasms to make his wife feel okay about their sex life, and her own lovemaking skills.  It really provides a different perspective on men, doesn’t it? Who says guys are just unfeeling louts who care only about themselves?   © 2009 Psychology Today. This RSS Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact blogs@psychologytoday.com so we can take legal action immediately.

See the original post here:
Men Who Fake Orgasms

The Pathologizing of a Culture

February 1, 2009 in Blogs, Psychology Today by Psychology Today

A young woman in her mid-twenties recently came in for her first visit with me.  Three months earlier she had experienced her first bout of anxiety and it had become more acute thereafter. She went on to explain that she had been seeing a psychiatrist who had prescribed four different psychotropic medications, simultaneously. Complaining of a blurred and disconnected feeling, she offered that she was uncertain as to whether the cause was physical, emotional and psychological—or a symptom of the gross invasion of this massive drugging.   I asked her if she had engaged in any therapy with either this psychiatrist or anyone else. “ He told me I didn’t need any therapy, just take the medication.” I gathered myself as I felt my ire arising. This medical professional seemingly appeared indifferent as to what conspired to set off this disorder and equally removed from any healing intervention, other than submitting her to an avalanche of very serious medication. I am increasingly witnessing such abhorrent behavior by many practitioners in the mental health profession. I must note that I am not opposed to psychotropic medication; simply the indiscriminate and flagrant abuse of it. Moreover, I find the reliance upon and dominance of prescription medication over psychotherapy to be alarming. During the course of our first meeting it become rather apparent as to why her life had unfolded in this manner and in fact, the anxiety made sense, as she had always struggled with her self value and her relentless measuring and judging of herself had more or less assured such a crisis. We are now working effectively toward reframing her beliefs and thoughts as she seeks to transform her life experience.   Depression, anxiety and other symptoms of emotional and mental distress have become so commonplace that they are literally being institutionalized. What was once considered an abnormality has now become quite normal. We should be asking why that is so. The rates of occurrence are staggering. They indicate the emergence of an epidemic. There is something terribly amiss here. This data indicates that what we refer to as mental disorder is, in fact, quite normative. It’s beginning to look as if the disorder is, in fact, the order. I am suggesting that in part it is the pathologizing of stressful, yet normal human experience, that we indeed create a culture of pathology. I would offer that what would otherwise be a normal experience of the ups and downs of being human, are now viewed through the prism of dysfunction. Every challenge and travail has a diagnostic label affixed to it and we become a nation of victims–both to the malaise and the pathologizing of what it means to be human. Having said this, there are no doubt other contributing factors to this problem—primarily cultural— that will be the subject of my next blog. The hegemony of the pharmaceutical industry The pharmaceutical industry is second only to the military industrial complex in terms of size and revenue. This industry has taken a leading role in the education and training of psychiatrists and the field has become for the most part a profession of diagnosis and medication, marginalizing actual psychotherapy. The overarching force in American culture is profit and there is enormous profit earned from the business of medicating people. At times, life simply presents challenges and struggles that very understandably cause distress. Yet, when we drug away the symptoms we invariably weaken the individual’s capacity to cope and to grow, as they become habituated to the medication and disempowered in their own ability to transcend their struggle. Recently, I heard a colleague recount the following story: A new client came in to see him and told him that her husband had just left her and their three young children. She was overwhelmed and anxious about finances. She indicated to him that her previous therapist had recommended anti-depressants. A pill can’t cure or alleviate the circumstances that her life presented. Yes, this woman was likely depressed, but for a very good reason. Her depression isn’t clinical, but situational and due to real life stressors. She doesn’t need medication; she needs support and encouragement to face her challenges. We need to look more circumspectly at the automatic default of prescribing pharmaceuticals and selectively determine when medication is truly advantageous, yet not subscribe blindly to the medicating of a population. The dysfunction of diagnosis A diagnosis has become confused with being an actual entity. Diagnosis should be a practitioner’s best effort to describe and summarize an individual’s challenges and circumstances and correlate that evaluation to a DSM descriptor. Instead it has become concretized to be an actual thing. Last week, as I was walking down the corridor from my office I overheard a therapist speaking with another about their client. “Jane has ADD,” she offered. Tongue in cheek, I inquired, “What do you mean?” “My client Jane has ADD,” she once again proclaimed, bewildered by my feigned ignorance. I corrected her as I asked, “You mean you see behaviors in Jane that conform to what we call ADD?” Diagnoses should not be confused with an actual material essence as much as they ought to be accurate descriptions for the purpose of coherent communication about a person’s circumstances. The diagnosis is a description, our best attempts to summarize the great complexity and inestimable variables that account for a person’s life. The only certainty is a prevailing uncertainty in this most subjective science. It is a cardinal error to aggrandize our inclination to categorize and play master of the universe with people’s lives. When the board of psychiatrists convene to construct new diagnostic language to describe disorders that they see occuring in the mental health community, it may serve a useful purpose; one of describing prevailing circumstances seen through a subjective filter. But we loose sight of the intention to describe rather than to construct. When the person becomes the diagnosis, we loose the ability to see that thought created the diagnosis, makes an attribution of that thought to a human life and then steps back in denial of the whole process. Of course, this error of categorization or what Alfred North Whitehead referred to as the fallacy of misplaced concreteness, aligns perfectly with the profit driven goals of the pharmaceutical industry. I would offer that an unconscious conspiracy occurs between the hegemony of the drug industry and the loss of the healing capacity of the therapist. They result in what I refer to as the pathologizing of a culture. © 2009 Psychology Today. This RSS Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact blogs@psychologytoday.com so we can take legal action immediately.

Read the original: 
The Pathologizing of a Culture

The $70,000 Solution: Escape from the Nursing Home

January 13, 2009 in Blogs, Psychology Today by Psychology Today

Lucky you. Your number just hit big on Lotto, and you’re getting a payout of $70,000 a year! Just in time. You’re frail, and at age 65 you wonder how far your measly social security check will go. Unlucky you. You dance for joy and fall and break your hip. You wind up in the hospital instead of on easy street, and the docs don’t want to discharge you back home. They’re worried you’ll fall again, and they notice you’re a bit dazed and confused. Not to worry. You do have that $70,000 annual payment. Surely you’ll land on your feet in a room with a view. But would you like that room to be a hospital-style room with only a curtain for privacy? Would you like your door to be always open for strangers to walk in to poke and prod? Would you want it to be noisy with loudspeakers, loud talking, and beeping medical equipment? In other words, the typical nursing home. Seventy thousand dollars is the average annual nursing home fee, whether you are Brooke Astor and can afford to pay for it out of pocket, whether you have long-term care insurance, or whether you’re on welfare and your stay is funded by Medicaid–which alone accounted for $54 billion of the $122 billion national expenditure in 2005. Who plans for this? Few elders or their families make a deliberate, considered decision to move to a nursing home. Institutionalization more likely follows an accident or sudden illness. The slip, the fall, and the broken hip is a typical scenario. First the hospital, then the nursing home for rehab. If things go well, you get back home. If they don’t, you may start hearing noises about your inability to be on your own. There’s little to argue against a nursing home for short-term rehab. But could we imagine a better way to spend that $70,000 windfall for the long-term? What about chucking the institution, staying home, and doing it a la carte? The average charge for a health aide is $18/hour. So a 24-7 health care aide would run your annual tab to $157,680, blowing through your $70,000. But a little economy of scale goes a long way. Three frail elders could share an apartment and a 24-hour aide and have almost $52,000 left over for food, clothing, shelter, physical therapy, and fun and frolic. In most cases, a nursing home is way more than necessary–a sledgehammer for a thumb tack. Many people need just a little bit of help–someone to dispense their meds, prepare their meals, and help to get in and out of bed. Others might need 24-hour care, but not a nursing home. Assisted living–the halfway house between home-sweet-home and the nursing home–will fit the bill. But, oddly, Medicaid won’t foot the assisted living bill. Medicaid will pay only for care in medical facilities, and assisted living doesn’t qualify–even though the average annual cost is significantly lower, about $30,000. Add up the elderly millions who will eventually qualify for Medicaid, and think of the billions in savings. This is only one of the irrationalities in our health care system. Insurance companies and government health financing agencies will pay tens of thousands of dollars for psychiatric hospitalization, but severely limit the hundreds of dollars for cost-effective outpatient psychotherapy. This despite abundant evidence that an ounce of prevention–outpatient therapy–is worth innumerable pounds of cures in hospitals. The supposed gold standard for care is to provide services in the "least restrictive environment." Unnecessarily shuttling people into the most restrictive setting grossly violates this standard. The idea of pooled resources and cooperative living arrangements is not new, nor does it originate in eldercare. In 1963, George Fairweather, a psychologist, proposed a model–the Community Lodge Program–that offered a way for psychiatric patients to live outside of hospitals. Groups of patients pool their government benefits, buy or rent lodging, start businesses, and hire professional staff to meet their special needs. Today, there are lodge programs across the nation. When psychiatric patients or elders hire their own staff and run their own programs, they are transformed from dependent patients to empowered captains of their own fate. The lodge program is but one of the good ideas to avoid hospital style institutionalization for the frail elderly. Aging in place is an idea that has an intrinsic appeal to my iconoclastic baby boomer generation. The problem is not a lack of ideas, but public policy that resists thinking outside the medical model box. But that box is bursting at the seams. Everyone is worrying about how the diminutive x, y, and z generations will pay for all of us boomers in our dotage. Financial shortfalls, rather than creative imagination, may force the diversion of funding into more cost-effective, less restrictive, more consumer controlled environments. My graying Woodstock generation could come to look at cooperative care arrangements as a last chance to join the commune they only fantasized about a generation ago. It could be summers of love for the autumns of our days (A version of this appeared as an op-ed in the New York Times (Jsnusty 17, 2007) as " Escape from the Nursing Home ." Here I have the opportunity to publish it as I originally wrote it with a different ending.) © 2009 Psychology Today. This RSS Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact blogs@psychologytoday.com so we can take legal action immediately.

More:
The $70,000 Solution: Escape from the Nursing Home

How David Beats Goliath in Problem-solving

January 12, 2009 in Blogs, Psychology Today by Psychology Today

Here’s the problem: Your circle of competence is small, but the demands of the world are great. How do you make your circle of competence speak to the problem? The answer is akin to how people use myths. Historian of religions Jonathan Z. Smith drew on anthropologist Victor Turner’s work in divination to explain how myths are similar to wine. People can make wine from nearly any fruit but typically make wine only from grapes. Yet from that initial reduction in choices (from any fruit to just grapes), there then follows a great expansion in that there are thousands of different kinds of wines, all made from grapes. From "an almost limitless horizon of possibilities that are at hand," said Smith, the field of possible cultural meanings is reduced to the fixed set of meanings that are contained in the myth. In other words, myths are often a small number of stories that people tell again and again. "Then," Smith elaborated, "the most intense ingenuity is exercised to overcome the reduction" when people apply these cultural meanings to deal with a problem. That is, even though there are a small number of stories in the myth, people make these stories speak to an ever-increasing number of different circumstances. People apply ancient sutras to decisions on biotechnology; they ask the Bible to speak to issues of nuclear proliferation. In other words, your circle of competence may be quite small, but by exercising it creatively, you can apply it to many problems. Smith, J. 1993. Map Is Not Territory: Studies in the History of Religions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Excerpted from Lasting Contribution: How to Think, Plan, and Act to Accomplish Meaningful Work by Tad Waddington. Find out more at http://www.lastingcontribution.com .   © 2009 Psychology Today. This RSS Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact blogs@psychologytoday.com so we can take legal action immediately.

More:
How David Beats Goliath in Problem-solving

Avatar of Psychology Today

by Vaughan

Laughing gas increases imagination, suggestibility

January 8, 2009 in Blogs, Mind Hacks by Vaughan

A new study has found that laughing gas, a common anaesthetic used by dentists, increases the vividness of imagination and also increases suggestibility, making people slightly more likely to experience hypnosis-like suggestions. The study, just published in the medical journal Psychopharmacology , stems from the informal observations of dentists that patients under laughing gas ( nitrous oxide ) sedation are particularly suggestible and the researchers aimed to test this out in more detail. The researchers randomised patients at a dental surgery to either receive a nitrous oxide and oxygen mix, or just oxygen, with the patients not knowing which they were receiving. Two weeks later they were invited back and given which ever type of gas mix they hadn’t already had. While inhaling each gas mix, the participants were asked to complete a measure of imaginative ability, rating the clarity and vividness of their visual imagery, as well as being given various suggestions – without the hypnotic induction – from the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale. This includes suggestions that your hands might move of their own accord, to suggested temporary paralysis, to a suggestion to experience hallucinated sounds – to name but a few. The researchers found that nitrous oxide boosted imaginative ability considerably, and increased suggestibility modestly but reliably. The paper discusses the small but interesting literature on which drugs affect suggestibility, and reviews some of the past studies which have tested some quite surprising substances in this way: Little research has investigated the effects of other drugs upon suggestibility in a controlled manner. Sjoberg and Hollister (1965) administered lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), mescaline and psilocybin separately and in combination to participants and measured imaginative suggestibility before and after drug administration. Gibson et al (1977) measured the effect of benzodiazepine administration upon hypnotic suggestibility, and Kelly et al (1978) tested the effect of cannabis intoxication upon the imaginative suggestibility of participants initially scoring low to medium on a standardised scale. Details of these studies and the resulting changes in suggestibility are given in Table 2 [see further down this page for a web version]. The greatest changes in suggestibility, in order of decreasing size, are evident after administration of nitrous oxide, cannabis, LSD, mescaline, combination of [LSD+mescaline+psilocybin] and diazepam. So it seems that nitrous oxide may have a particular suggestibility boosting effect. By the way, the study was led by psychologist Matt Whalley, who also runs the excellent Hypnosis and Suggestion website , undoubtedly the best internet resource for scientific information on hypnosis. Link to study. Link to PubMed entry for same. Link to excellent Hypnosis and Suggestion website.

Read the original:
Laughing gas increases imagination, suggestibility

Avatar of Psychology Today

by Vaughan

Mind Bites

January 4, 2009 in Blogs, Mind Hacks by Vaughan

Mind Bites is a beautiful photography project by artist Will Lion which combines striking images with quotes from cognitive science research. You can either view it as a Flickr photo set or as an interactive Flash gallery . The image on the left is one of the more abstract pictures, but the full range contains everything from portraits, to landscapes, to still life photos – with the research quotes taken from studies on memory to hormonal influence on the earnings of lap dancers. I can’t help thinking these would make great pictures to have in a psychology department which are usually adorned with faded conference posters and dull oil paintings. The full set of Will Lion’s ‘Mind Bites’ project is both visually engaging and thought-provoking which is the essence of much great art. Link to images as Flickr photo set. Link to Mind Bites as interactive Flash gallery.

Read more: 
Mind Bites

Avatar of Psychology Today

by Vaughan

Sex, orgasm and childbirth: a discomforting mix

January 2, 2009 in Blogs, Mind Hacks by Vaughan

Petra Boyton has a fantastic piece on the experience of orgasm during birth – the focus of an upcoming documentary and a subject likely to cause discomfort in some. Petra discusses the relationship between sexual stimulation and labour noting that sexual pleasure has been reported during childbirth in the medical literature. This is from a 1987 review article on sexuality and childbirth: Newton (1971 , 1973) argued that women’s three reproductive acts: coitus, parturition, and lactation are psychophysiologically interrelated and trigger caretaking behavior, a necessity for species survival. Features that are evident in both coitus (sexual arousal and orgasm) and in undisturbed childbirth include changes in respiration (hyperpnea and tachypnea), vocalization, strained facial expression, rhythmic uterine contractions, loosening of the cervical mucous plug, frequent supine position with thighs adducted, a tendency to become uninhibited, exceptional muscular strength, an altered state of consciousness with rapid return to alert awareness after orgasm or birth, and a profound feeling of joy or ecstasy following orgasm or delivery. In addition, clitoral engorgement usually associated with sexual arousal has been described in labor in a number of parturients, beginning at 8-9cm cervical dilation (clitoral engorgement has also been described on occasion during stressful situations, without sexual stimulation) (Rossi, 1973). Intense orgasmic sensations have also been described during the second stage of labor (Masters and Johnson, 1966; Sarlin, 1963). However, there is also evidence that sexual stimulation during labour has been shown to help delivery and ease labour-related pain – such as research on the benefits of breast stimulation during birthing. However, Petra’s write-up makes clear that systematic research is still lacking, so we’re still not sure about how many women experience orgasm during birth, or how effective all types of active sexual stimulation might be to assist birth. However, this topic is contentious owing to the psychological discomfort it causes. Perhaps the clash between the stereotypes that birth is innocent and pure while sex is dirty and salacious mean that some people will just find the whole subject too much to handle. There are many of these areas in medicine. For example, sexual relationships between people with learning disabilities. The thought of two people with Down syndrome having sex causes great discomfort in many people, despite the fact that it is perfectly possible for some people with Down’s understand and consent to the situation. If we assume that all people who are able to consent and have found a willing consenting partner should be able to freely participate in a sexual relationship, perhaps it would be useful to develop a test to help evaluate people with learning abilities to make sure they are both able to understand and consenting. These sorts of tests are common for testing the capacity for other sorts of decisions – such as financial responsibility, or decisions to refuse medical care – but discomfort factor tends to mean that these areas are under-researched. With reference to the upcoming documentary, the website for the film has quite a curious tone, and I have to say, is slightly sensational. Buy the DVD or CD! Share Orgasmic Birth with your friends and family this holiday season with our special 5 pack of DVD’s and CD soundtrack and SAVE. Subtitled in French, Spanish, German, and Portuguese. I can’t say a 5 pack of the Orgasmic Birth (and soundtrack!) would the first thing that comes to mind when buying Christmas presents, but there you go. Link to Dr Petra on ‘Is there such a thing as an ‘orgasmic birth’?’

View original post here:
Sex, orgasm and childbirth: a discomforting mix